Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 133
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $20,061 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bryce L Blickenstaff | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $1,672 |
| 2 | Twin Spruce Farm Inc | Richmond, MN 56368 | $1,142 |
| 3 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $1,019 |
| 4 | Peter G Mursu | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $942 |
| 5 | Larry Wallevand | Henning, MN 56551 | $916 |
| 6 | Aaron Menze | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $803 |
| 7 | Hendrickx Bros Farms | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $767 |
| 8 | Bradley Linder | Henning, MN 56551 | $762 |
| 9 | Steve Steinbach | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $733 |
| 10 | Garys Dairy Inc | Henning, MN 56551 | $633 |
| 11 | Jared Huwe | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $614 |
| 12 | Nelson Farming Association | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $370 |
| 13 | Paul Boehland | Bertha, MN 56437 | $362 |
| 14 | Donald R Honer | Perham, MN 56573 | $340 |
| 15 | Thomas Hendrickx | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $338 |
| 16 | Nathan Tobkin | Perham, MN 56573 | $325 |
| 17 | Dennis Peyerl | Henning, MN 56551 | $315 |
| 18 | Rjc Enterprises Of Perham Inc | Perham, MN 56573 | $264 |
| 19 | Allen L Pauly | Sebeka, MN 56477 | $252 |
| 20 | Ryan Peppersack | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $248 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf