Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 751
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $7,792,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mark Riestenberg | Perham, MN 56573 | $39,379 |
42 | Daniel M Dreyer | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $38,968 |
43 | Michael Johansen | Underwood, MN 56586 | $38,407 |
44 | Bradley Linder | Henning, MN 56551 | $38,233 |
45 | Ronald Sakry | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $38,154 |
46 | Daryl Zeise | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $37,607 |
47 | Names Dairy | Battle Lake, MN 56515 | $37,510 |
48 | Peter G Mursu | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $37,347 |
49 | Blake Farms Inc | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $34,368 |
50 | Lueders Farms Inc | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $33,507 |
51 | Meyer-becker Farms Llp | Perham, MN 56573 | $32,450 |
52 | Keil Farms LLC | Perham, MN 56573 | $32,219 |
53 | Garys Dairy Inc | Henning, MN 56551 | $31,412 |
54 | Charles Guck | Perham, MN 56573 | $31,084 |
55 | Sylvester 'bud' Honer | Dent, MN 56528 | $30,936 |
56 | Byer Brothers Dairy | Perham, MN 56573 | $30,286 |
57 | Dennis Tigges | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $30,022 |
58 | Antonsen Dairy LLC | Frazee, MN 56544 | $29,995 |
59 | T & K Farms | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $29,973 |
60 | Keith Aho | Sebeka, MN 56477 | $29,378 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”