Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 412
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $1,147,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Paul M Klinnert | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $3,356 |
82 | Kenneth Moenkedick | Perham, MN 56573 | $3,332 |
83 | Roger Deckert | Henning, MN 56551 | $3,321 |
84 | Koehler Dairy | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $3,228 |
85 | Ryan Peppersack | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $3,178 |
86 | Dennis Fechtner | Perham, MN 56573 | $3,167 |
87 | Donald Hansen | Vining, MN 56588 | $3,118 |
88 | Roberts Dairy LLC | Menahga, MN 56464 | $3,112 |
89 | Duwayne L Thalmann | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $3,101 |
90 | Joel Gorentz | Dent, MN 56528 | $3,078 |
91 | Michael Hannuksela | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $3,047 |
92 | Kenneth Raap | Henning, MN 56551 | $3,005 |
93 | Alan Peppersack | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $2,985 |
94 | Virgil Bernu | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $2,974 |
95 | Benjamin Keil | Dent, MN 56528 | $2,970 |
96 | Ray Hendrickx | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $2,912 |
97 | Loren Koehler | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $2,845 |
98 | Jeffrey Wiebe | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $2,791 |
99 | Eugene J Stoll | Dent, MN 56528 | $2,785 |
100 | David Bauck | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $2,779 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”