Total Conservation Programs in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,732
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $63,757,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Stanley Malikowski | Frazee, MN 56544 | $351,535 |
2 | Roger Quittschreiber | Frazee, MN 56544 | $338,961 |
3 | Francis J Snelgrove | Fargo, ND 58104 | $309,569 |
4 | Gary Greenwood | Henning, MN 56551 | $294,735 |
5 | Marvin Swyter | Perham, MN 56573 | $284,604 |
6 | Thomas C Franklin | Frazee, MN 56544 | $272,922 |
7 | Farm Boys LLC | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $243,224 |
8 | Bruce Veden | Wadena, MN 56482 | $239,281 |
9 | Laurel Riedel | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $236,534 |
10 | Henry E Johnson | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $231,906 |
11 | Wayne Quittschreiber | Perham, MN 56573 | $231,022 |
12 | Donald Leyh | Bertha, MN 56437 | $229,074 |
13 | Dennis A Kopveiler | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $224,466 |
14 | James Loerzel | Perham, MN 56573 | $210,746 |
15 | Vance Sherman | Richville, MN 56576 | $205,950 |
16 | Stephen R Hendrickx | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $205,804 |
17 | James A Nordbeck | Vergas, MN 56587 | $201,787 |
18 | Monte Bachmann | Horace, ND 58047 | $193,796 |
19 | Wes Kube | Richville, MN 56576 | $189,059 |
20 | Kieth Schwantz | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $188,455 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>