Deficiency Payment in Pine County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 301
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Pine County, Minnesota totaled $429,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeffrey Peterson | Pine City, MN 55063 | $14,040 |
| 2 | Kruse Farms | Pine City, MN 55063 | $12,258 |
| 3 | Mark A Carlson | Pine City, MN 55063 | $9,451 |
| 4 | Timothy Carlson | Pine City, MN 55063 | $8,465 |
| 5 | Thomas E Rys | Rock Creek, MN 55067 | $7,855 |
| 6 | Clyde Moulton Est | Rush City, MN 55069 | $7,663 |
| 7 | Donald Folkestad | Braham, MN 55006 | $6,324 |
| 8 | Greg Geisler | Pine City, MN 55063 | $5,746 |
| 9 | Triple Pine Farms | Pine City, MN 55063 | $5,184 |
| 10 | Leo Mckenzie | Braham, MN 55006 | $4,893 |
| 11 | Auers Dairy | Grasston, MN 55030 | $4,436 |
| 12 | Donald E Sikkink | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $4,344 |
| 13 | Robert Downing | Pine City, MN 55063 | $4,144 |
| 14 | Glenn Nordrum | Pine City, MN 55063 | $4,101 |
| 15 | Archie L Johnson | Sturgeon Lake, MN 55783 | $4,056 |
| 16 | Phillip J Myers Trust | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $4,010 |
| 17 | Richard Heyda | Pine City, MN 55063 | $3,797 |
| 18 | Erling M Olson | Pine City, MN 55063 | $3,616 |
| 19 | Scott Lucht | Braham, MN 55006 | $3,579 |
| 20 | Roger A Nelson | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $3,572 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf