Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 392
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $2,316,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Paul John Britton | Waseca, MN 56093 | $13,274 |
42 | Bernard Gerald Donelan | Waseca, MN 56093 | $13,208 |
43 | Dann Phillips | Hartland, MN 56042 | $13,139 |
44 | Rick Hoehn Farms Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $12,807 |
45 | Keith Dean Schlaak | New Richland, MN 56072 | $12,779 |
46 | Roundbank Waseca ** | Waseca, MN 56093 | $12,477 |
47 | Terry Dean Hansen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $12,398 |
48 | Adryn Vincent Peterson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $11,816 |
49 | Zimmerman Farms Waseca | Waseca, MN 56093 | $11,794 |
50 | Burke Farms | Janesville, MN 56048 | $11,665 |
51 | Jeffrey Orville Johnson | Waseca, MN 56093 | $11,632 |
52 | Aaron Krause | Farmington, MN 55024 | $11,530 |
53 | Erik David Jacobson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $11,341 |
54 | Wayne Lester Trahms | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $11,220 |
55 | Mitchell Wayne Kruger | New Richland, MN 56072 | $10,912 |
56 | Leon Ellis Schoenrock | New Richland, MN 56072 | $10,888 |
57 | David Wayne Trahms | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $10,843 |
58 | Alan Donald Lewer | Waseca, MN 56093 | $10,565 |
59 | Glenn Robert Hoehn | New Richland, MN 56072 | $10,434 |
60 | Gregory Dean Moe | New Richland, MN 56072 | $10,356 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”