Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 391
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $2,316,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Below Farms Llp | Waseca, MN 56093 | $86,068 |
| 2 | Douglas Dale Christopherson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $82,341 |
| 3 | David Darrol Sponberg | New Richland, MN 56072 | $82,341 |
| 4 | Pinedale Farms | Waseca, MN 56093 | $40,147 |
| 5 | Sorg Farms Partnership | Hastings, MN 55033 | $35,191 |
| 6 | Richard Norbert Schultz | New Richland, MN 56072 | $34,945 |
| 7 | Stencel Farms Inc | Waseca, MN 56093 | $33,575 |
| 8 | Chris Sonnek | New Richland, MN 56072 | $28,315 |
| 9 | Wacholz Brothers | New Richland, MN 56072 | $24,290 |
| 10 | David John Winegar | Waseca, MN 56093 | $24,145 |
| 11 | Richard Vern Possin | New Richland, MN 56072 | $22,399 |
| 12 | Schue Farms LLC | New Richland, MN 56072 | $21,506 |
| 13 | Todd Charles Selvik | Waseca, MN 56093 | $21,341 |
| 14 | Gregory Trent Roesler | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $21,304 |
| 15 | Ac Farms LLC | New Richland, MN 56072 | $20,786 |
| 16 | Timothy John Nelson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $20,478 |
| 17 | Jeffrey Dale Huelsnitz | Waseca, MN 56093 | $19,704 |
| 18 | Gary William Budach | New Richland, MN 56072 | $18,589 |
| 19 | Rlp Enterprises Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $18,572 |
| 20 | Brian David Mittelstaedt | Janesville, MN 56048 | $18,501 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf