Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Waseca County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 46
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $70,421 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John Robert Guse | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $730 |
22 | Luann Kristine Guse | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $730 |
23 | Sorg Farms Partnership | Hastings, MN 55033 | $693 |
24 | Groh Farms | Janesville, MN 56048 | $622 |
25 | Paul William Born | Waseca, MN 56093 | $506 |
26 | Kevin K Remund | Morristown, MN 55052 | $482 |
27 | Douglas Dale Christopherson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $400 |
28 | David Darrol Sponberg | New Richland, MN 56072 | $400 |
29 | Fields Farms Inc | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $362 |
30 | Ryan Stenzel | New Richland, MN 56072 | $286 |
31 | Jessica Lynn Stenzel | New Richland, MN 56072 | $286 |
32 | Paul A Anderson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $183 |
33 | Roundbank Waseca ** | Waseca, MN 56093 | $134 |
34 | Chad Chester Bethke | Owatonna, MN 55060 | $121 |
35 | Thomas M Bauman | Waseca, MN 56093 | $100 |
36 | Jon Tom & Dave Trahms Farm Partne | Janesville, MN 56048 | $31 |
37 | Dennis Lee Hanson | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $29 |
38 | Roger Mark Haley | Waseca, MN 56093 | $20 |
39 | William J Schrader | Easton, MN 56025 | $17 |
40 | Thomas Joseph Starman | New Richland, MN 56072 | $8 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”