Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Waseca County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 46
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $70,421 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wacholz Brothers | New Richland, MN 56072 | $9,589 |
| 2 | Greg John Strobel | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $8,130 |
| 3 | Robin Strobel | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $8,130 |
| 4 | Trams Farms Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $6,647 |
| 5 | Scott David Lynch | Janesville, MN 56048 | $5,732 |
| 6 | Frank Gerard Galler | Elysian, MN 56028 | $5,423 |
| 7 | A & A Farms LLC | Waseca, MN 56093 | $2,782 |
| 8 | Paul George Berry | Janesville, MN 56048 | $2,159 |
| 9 | Richard Norbert Schultz | New Richland, MN 56072 | $2,138 |
| 10 | Scott M Dauk | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $2,106 |
| 11 | Kevin Robert Trahms | Janesville, MN 56048 | $2,054 |
| 12 | Ryan Strobel | Eagle Lake, MN 56024 | $2,011 |
| 13 | Dale Richard Schweer | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $1,095 |
| 14 | Scott Raymond Schweer | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $1,095 |
| 15 | Bruce J Johnson | Waseca, MN 56093 | $1,008 |
| 16 | Dean Alan Buendorf | New Richland, MN 56072 | $884 |
| 17 | Chad Michael Buendorf | New Richland, MN 56072 | $857 |
| 18 | Troy Nathan Buendorf | New Richland, MN 56072 | $857 |
| 19 | Possin Organics LLC | New Richland, MN 56072 | $789 |
| 20 | Christopher Dauk | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $787 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf