Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 63
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota totaled $306,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dennis Dean Preuss | Echo, MN 56237 | $33,410 |
2 | Vicky Lynn Preuss | Echo, MN 56237 | $33,410 |
3 | Roger A Busiahn | Wood Lake, MN 56297 | $31,710 |
4 | Stengel Honey Company | Clarkfield, MN 56223 | $24,258 |
5 | Knudson Brothers Farm Partnership | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $22,204 |
6 | Gerry D Busiahn | Wood Lake, MN 56297 | $19,055 |
7 | Leland C Mccoy Jr | Clarkfield, MN 56223 | $14,924 |
8 | D Robert Schemel | Spicer, MN 56288 | $11,560 |
9 | Dallas R Schroeder | Echo, MN 56237 | $10,672 |
10 | Dave W Schwerin | Wood Lake, MN 56297 | $10,351 |
11 | Diane L Schwerin | Wood Lake, MN 56297 | $10,351 |
12 | Gunval L Knudson | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $8,938 |
13 | Kenneth L Benz | Canby, MN 56220 | $5,567 |
14 | Leslie R Enevoldsen | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $5,027 |
15 | Alan W Westphal | Canby, MN 56220 | $4,995 |
16 | Roger Citrowske | Boyd, MN 56218 | $4,262 |
17 | Keith Citrowske | Canby, MN 56220 | $4,262 |
18 | Henrietta B Groenhoff Deceased | Canby, MN 56220 | $3,865 |
19 | Wilfred Brogaard | Ghent, MN 56239 | $3,664 |
20 | Edward A Victor | Canby, MN 56220 | $3,607 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>