Conservation Reserve Program in Bolivar County, Mississippi, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 111
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Bolivar County, Mississippi totaled $894,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Allendale Planting Co | Shelby, MS 38774 | $78,921 |
2 | Game Inc | Rosedale, MS 38769 | $50,000 |
3 | C D Long Investments Partners Lp | Rosedale, MS 38769 | $50,000 |
4 | Wrights Crossing Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $46,940 |
5 | Huntington Point Land Co Lp | Greenville, MS 38702 | $41,640 |
6 | Leo Pittman Edwards | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $37,997 |
7 | Big Four Management Services Trus | Benoit, MS 38725 | $31,158 |
8 | Rubicon Farms LLC | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $27,574 |
9 | Rayner Planting Co | Merigold, MS 38759 | $24,086 |
10 | Tofu Farms LLC | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $23,181 |
11 | Melissa Ann Prewitt | Boyle, MS 38730 | $18,996 |
12 | Serene Fox Farm, LLC | Shaw, MS 38773 | $16,784 |
13 | Conn Farms LLC | Greenville, MS 38701 | $16,636 |
14 | Berclair Farms LLC | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $16,070 |
15 | Jimmy Warren | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $15,765 |
16 | Bern Prewitt Sr | Boyle, MS 38730 | $14,826 |
17 | Elizabeth Anne Jones | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $14,440 |
18 | Fount Ray Armstrong Jr Estate | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $13,990 |
19 | Break Land Company | Greenville, MS 38701 | $13,561 |
20 | Charles M Walker Trust U/a Dtd June 18, 2002 | Catlin, IL 61817 | $13,138 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>