Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Calhoun County, Mississippi, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 196
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Calhoun County, Mississippi totaled $62,114 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Regions Bank ** | Grenada, MS 38901 | $8,053 |
| 2 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $5,742 |
| 3 | 4 E Farms Partnership | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $5,619 |
| 4 | Tony Morgan Farms Inc | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $3,499 |
| 5 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $3,182 |
| 6 | Guaranty Bank & Trust Co ** | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $2,732 |
| 7 | Steve Parker Farm | Big Creek, MS 38914 | $1,527 |
| 8 | T A Beckett Jr | Bruce, MS 38915 | $1,494 |
| 9 | C & E Farms Partnership | Coffeeville, MS 38922 | $1,404 |
| 10 | N & W Farms Inc | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $1,345 |
| 11 | Bowen Farm | Randolph, MS 38864 | $1,343 |
| 12 | Mitzi Aron | Houlka, MS 38850 | $1,311 |
| 13 | Brent Parker | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $1,243 |
| 14 | Kent Parker | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $1,094 |
| 15 | Tamsie Morris | Houlka, MS 38850 | $979 |
| 16 | Ronald D Washington | Houlka, MS 38850 | $937 |
| 17 | Bbf Partnership | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $936 |
| 18 | Lynn C Hubbard | Eupora, MS 39744 | $899 |
| 19 | Mike C Williams | Houlka, MS 38850 | $878 |
| 20 | William R Fleming | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $833 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf