Direct Payment Program in Calhoun County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,166
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Calhoun County, Mississippi totaled $14,888,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Topashaw Farms Partnership | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $640,872 |
2 | Steve Parker Farm | Big Creek, MS 38914 | $597,811 |
3 | B & S Farms | Eupora, MS 39744 | $431,777 |
4 | Wooten Farms | Coffeeville, MS 38922 | $371,746 |
5 | Carroll Hemphill Farms | Gore Springs, MS 38929 | $322,466 |
6 | L C Vance | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $299,972 |
7 | John G Brower Jr Farm | Water Valley, MS 38965 | $290,290 |
8 | James S Warner Jr Farm | Big Creek, MS 38914 | $287,170 |
9 | Nancy Lou D Denton | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $285,968 |
10 | Bhf And Company | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $278,781 |
11 | Howard W Morgan Farm | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $277,314 |
12 | Edmondson Farming Partnership | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $264,811 |
13 | William C Tindall | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $257,070 |
14 | Toby Parker Farms | Big Creek, MS 38914 | $252,489 |
15 | R M England | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $250,675 |
16 | Tony L Morgan | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $243,178 |
17 | Craig Pittman | Gore Springs, MS 38929 | $234,757 |
18 | Scotchie M Denton | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $233,691 |
19 | George K Bingham | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $206,745 |
20 | Carl Booth Denton Farm | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $204,506 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>