Conservation Reserve Program in Claiborne County, Mississippi, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 231

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Claiborne County, Mississippi totaled $12,077,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2021
1Galbreath Family Lmtd PartnshpNatchez, MS 39120$676,573
2Claude C JumonvilleVentress, LA 70783$593,834
3Louis Cortez ByrdBrookhaven, MS 39602$559,979
4Rushbrook Farms IncOxford, MS 38655$490,573
5Billy James CalhounOak Grove, LA 71263$450,417
6Karla D BackLittle Rock, AR 72212$446,951
7George A HudsonPort Gibson, MS 39150$334,403
8Elizabeth L LangPattison, MS 39144$294,260
9Waterloo Farms IncPort Gibson, MS 39150$253,723
10Claiborne County Farm LLCVicksburg, MS 39182$243,637
11Claiborne County Farm T LLCVicksburg, MS 39182$243,637
12T J Segrest Sons IncPort Gibson, MS 39150$229,759
13Fairview Plantation L L CJackson, MS 39211$224,248
14Porter Plantations IncCollierville, TN 38017$217,200
15Lost Arrow Properties LLCJackson, MS 39236$202,680
16Anderson - Tully CoLake Village, AR 71653$181,165
17C D Porter Farms IncPattison, MS 39144$176,540
18Janet SalleyHermanville, MS 39086$169,244
19Harry L FranklinSandhill, MS 39161$166,810
20Clyde E LangPattison, MS 39144$157,103

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag