Counter Cyclical Program in Coahoma County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 481
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Coahoma County, Mississippi totaled $75,219,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mattson Farms | Lyon, MS 38645 | $2,828,520 |
| 2 | Omega Plantations | Lyon, MS 38645 | $1,877,803 |
| 3 | Delta Planting Company | Lyon, MS 38645 | $1,823,537 |
| 4 | Massey Planting Company | Lyon, MS 38645 | $1,791,954 |
| 5 | Increase Plantations | Lyon, MS 38645 | $1,466,339 |
| 6 | Stovall Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $1,415,693 |
| 7 | Ellendale Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $1,373,680 |
| 8 | Moon Lake Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $1,360,382 |
| 9 | Charles Antici Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $1,341,644 |
| 10 | Passageway Farms | Lyon, MS 38645 | $1,336,441 |
| 11 | Heaton Land Co | Lyon, MS 38645 | $1,312,008 |
| 12 | Heaton Farms | Lyon, MS 38645 | $1,297,603 |
| 13 | Arcadia Farms | Dublin, MS 38739 | $1,287,213 |
| 14 | Long Lake Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $1,286,568 |
| 15 | Matagorda Plantations | Lyon, MS 38645 | $1,281,509 |
| 16 | Riverbend Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $1,256,880 |
| 17 | Tedford Planting Company | Lyon, MS 38645 | $1,216,632 |
| 18 | Longino Planting Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $1,068,458 |
| 19 | Mascot Planting Company | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $1,058,743 |
| 20 | Agostinelli Farms Partnership II | Lyon, MS 38645 | $914,676 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf