Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Coahoma County, Mississippi, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 189
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Coahoma County, Mississippi totaled $36,027,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $1,134,839 |
2 | Home Cypress Farms | Lyon, MS 38645 | $891,171 |
3 | Charles Antici Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $718,647 |
4 | Wolf Lake Farms | Lyon, MS 38645 | $705,407 |
5 | Staple Cotton Discount Corp | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $696,089 |
6 | Long Lake Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $568,403 |
7 | Triple H Planting Co II | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $563,434 |
8 | Unruh Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $532,461 |
9 | Big River Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $527,426 |
10 | Gen 4 Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $507,666 |
11 | Campbell Brothers Farm No 2 | Lyon, MS 38645 | $498,709 |
12 | Westside Farms | Friars Point, MS 38631 | $495,426 |
13 | Homewood Planting Company | Lyon, MS 38645 | $471,807 |
14 | Talley Land Management | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $470,250 |
15 | Talley Planting Co | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $463,541 |
16 | Rodgers Planting Co | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $458,259 |
17 | Ellendale Land Company | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $443,256 |
18 | Massey Planting Company | Lyon, MS 38645 | $431,067 |
19 | Evans Planting Co A Partnership | Coahoma, MS 38617 | $417,146 |
20 | K & T Planting | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $415,632 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>