Farm Subsidy information
Franklin County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Franklin County, Mississippi, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 23
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Franklin County, Mississippi totaled $105,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Scarbrough Mcgehee Farms LLC | Orange Beach, AL 36561 | $26,909 |
2 | Seale Farm LLC | Meadville, MS 39653 | $16,944 |
3 | Scarbrough Dorsey Farms LLC | Orange Beach, AL 36561 | $7,664 |
4 | Joseph Ray Emfinger Jr | Meadville, MS 39653 | $5,324 |
5 | Nancy Sholar Stafford | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $4,877 |
6 | Stephen Allen Mcmanus | Meadville, MS 39653 | $4,714 |
7 | Cy Lambert | Natchez, MS 39120 | $4,671 |
8 | John Robert Delaney | Meadville, MS 39653 | $4,334 |
9 | Jamie Seale Jap Farms | Meadville, MS 39653 | $4,231 |
10 | Karen Walley Clements | Bude, MS 39630 | $3,774 |
11 | , | $2,970 | |
12 | Bryant Donavon Murray | Natchez, MS 39120 | $2,699 |
13 | Linda Genette Hunt | Meadville, MS 39653 | $2,490 |
14 | Jimmy Ben Walker | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $2,371 |
15 | Dixie Herring Clay | Meadville, MS 39653 | $2,093 |
16 | Beverly King Hill | Bude, MS 39630 | $1,486 |
17 | Todd Everette Bowlin | Brookhaven, MS 39601 | $1,482 |
18 | Russell Joseph Poirrier | Terry, MS 39170 | $1,472 |
19 | Tyler Shane Moak | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $1,446 |
20 | Lester Oliver Hill | Meadville, MS 39653 | $1,199 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>