Total Commodity Programs in Franklin County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 48
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Franklin County, Mississippi totaled $73,327 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Calcote Dairy Farms Inc | Brookhaven, MS 39601 | $17,405 |
| 2 | Seale Farm LLC | Meadville, MS 39653 | $13,012 |
| 3 | Herbert Steve Sullivan | Meadville, MS 39653 | $6,698 |
| 4 | Arliss Ike Williamson Jr | Meadville, MS 39653 | $3,911 |
| 5 | Jamie Seale Jap Farms | Meadville, MS 39653 | $3,539 |
| 6 | Homochitto River Park Inc | Meadville, MS 39653 | $2,366 |
| 7 | Stephen Allen Mcmanus | Meadville, MS 39653 | $2,350 |
| 8 | Joseph Ray Emfinger Jr | Meadville, MS 39653 | $1,674 |
| 9 | Shelly Norris Cowart | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $1,467 |
| 10 | William Lydell Rand | Meadville, MS 39653 | $1,279 |
| 11 | Gary W Bennett | Meadville, MS 39653 | $1,166 |
| 12 | Karen Walley Clements | Bude, MS 39630 | $1,160 |
| 13 | Billy Gene Martin Jr | Roxie, MS 39661 | $1,051 |
| 14 | Ottice Carey Mckenzie | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $852 |
| 15 | Nancy Sholar Stafford | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $822 |
| 16 | Ray Oliver Futch | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $799 |
| 17 | Joseph Blake Hemphill | Oxford, MS 38655 | $773 |
| 18 | Grady Malcolm Hall | Roxie, MS 39661 | $767 |
| 19 | Jammy Lee Lofton | Mc Call Creek, MS 39647 | $765 |
| 20 | Bryant Donavon Murray | Natchez, MS 39120 | $734 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf