Total Conservation Programs in Lee County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 599
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Lee County, Mississippi totaled $6,297,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Scruggs Farms Joint Venture | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $417,581 |
2 | James Homan Jr | Shannon, MS 38868 | $378,078 |
3 | M & M Scruggs Properties LLC | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $254,628 |
4 | Brices Crossroads Nat'l Battlefield | Baldwyn, MS 38824 | $245,010 |
5 | Tishomingo Farms Inc | Baldwyn, MS 38824 | $91,673 |
6 | C H Burns Realty Co Inc | Baldwyn, MS 38824 | $90,283 |
7 | Knowles Charlwood | Guntown, MS 38849 | $84,947 |
8 | Michael Barber | Plantersville, MS 38862 | $76,733 |
9 | Beulah Harper Collins | Richmond, TX 77406 | $72,106 |
10 | James Matthews Sr | Plantersville, MS 38862 | $69,122 |
11 | Thomas R Dabbs Jr | Nettleton, MS 38858 | $67,796 |
12 | Mitchell Scruggs Properties LLC | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $65,067 |
13 | Charlie Ruth Hallmark | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $57,269 |
14 | William E Abernathy | Shannon, MS 38868 | $54,010 |
15 | Steve Minor | Baldwyn, MS 38824 | $52,061 |
16 | M E & J Scruggs Family Properties LLC | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $50,696 |
17 | Georgie Lou Holley | Baldwyn, MS 38824 | $50,688 |
18 | Marman Ranch L L C | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $48,633 |
19 | Lanier H Mccullough | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $47,790 |
20 | Dry Creek LLC | Tupelo, MS 38801 | $47,717 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>