Loan Deficiency in Leflore County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 556
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Leflore County, Mississippi totaled $37,969,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Hope Farms | Schlater, MS 38952 | $1,835,703 |
| 2 | Ray Makamson Farms | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $1,695,574 |
| 3 | Tackett Farms | Schlater, MS 38952 | $1,479,033 |
| 4 | Larry Joe Makamson Farms | Sidon, MS 38954 | $1,149,240 |
| 5 | Saunders Farms | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $1,084,368 |
| 6 | Garry Makamson Farms | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $1,074,719 |
| 7 | Arant Acres | Ruleville, MS 38771 | $884,628 |
| 8 | Live Oaks Planting Company | Schlater, MS 38952 | $828,716 |
| 9 | Lamar Makamson Farms | Sidon, MS 38954 | $671,533 |
| 10 | Murtagh-walker Farms | Inverness, MS 38753 | $611,149 |
| 11 | Quiver Creek Farms Partnership | Schlater, MS 38952 | $591,274 |
| 12 | Delta Island Plantation | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $574,889 |
| 13 | Cood-penne-smith Farms | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $560,863 |
| 14 | Adron Farms | Minter City, MS 38944 | $488,699 |
| 15 | Roebuck Planting Company | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $475,860 |
| 16 | Sunnyside Planting Company | Holcomb, MS 38940 | $448,584 |
| 17 | Carver Company | Ruleville, MS 38771 | $448,203 |
| 18 | Hard Cash Planting Company | Indianola, MS 38751 | $419,813 |
| 19 | Makamson Planting Co | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $416,059 |
| 20 | G & T Farms | Schlater, MS 38952 | $412,032 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf