Farm Subsidy information
Lincoln County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Lincoln County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,086
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lincoln County, Mississippi totaled $17,871,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dwain W Case | Wesson, MS 39191 | $73,774 |
42 | Danny Harlan Quin Sr | Purvis, MS 39475 | $70,806 |
43 | Charles Lee Gatlin | Bogue Chitto, MS 39629 | $70,192 |
44 | Hilton Furr | Wesson, MS 39191 | $69,939 |
45 | Dry Creek Dairy | Wesson, MS 39191 | $68,746 |
46 | Owen Wayne Smith | Union Church, MS 39668 | $67,763 |
47 | Curtis Dean Lofton Sr | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $66,918 |
48 | Jason Curtis Lea | Sontag, MS 39665 | $66,847 |
49 | Georgia Rippy | Bogue Chitto, MS 39629 | $66,794 |
50 | Jeffery Wayne Gatlin | Bogue Chitto, MS 39629 | $66,541 |
51 | James Martin Moak | Summit, MS 39666 | $66,385 |
52 | George F May | Bogue Chitto, MS 39629 | $66,128 |
53 | Anthon Six Pack LLC | Hammond, LA 70403 | $65,824 |
54 | Loretta Johnston Hall | Bogue Chitto, MS 39629 | $64,110 |
55 | Kyle Britt King | Wesson, MS 39191 | $63,887 |
56 | James Roy Dyess | Brookhaven, MS 39603 | $62,898 |
57 | Gale Moak Rawls | Bogue Chitto, MS 39629 | $61,906 |
58 | Malinda Moak Rippy | Bogue Chitto, MS 39629 | $61,327 |
59 | Michael Lamar Smith | Brookhaven, MS 39601 | $59,825 |
60 | Hall Poultry Farm | Wesson, MS 39191 | $58,823 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”