Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Tunica County, Mississippi, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 85
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Tunica County, Mississippi totaled $7,994,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | First Security Bank ** | Batesville, MS 38606 | $1,238,621 |
2 | First National Bank Of Clarksdale ** | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $817,397 |
3 | Pinnacle Agriculture Distribution Inc | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $678,318 |
4 | Staple Cotton Discount Corp | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $615,514 |
5 | Bcf-09 | Tunica, MS 38676 | $537,497 |
6 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $481,541 |
7 | Bank Of Missouri ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $353,013 |
8 | Citizens Bank & Trust Co ** | Marks, MS 38646 | $315,578 |
9 | Canon Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $280,236 |
10 | Nab Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $277,774 |
11 | Myers Farm | Dundee, MS 38626 | $236,816 |
12 | Ltf III | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $198,896 |
13 | The Jefferson Bank ** | Greenville, MS 38704 | $173,101 |
14 | Dundee Farms | Dundee, MS 38626 | $166,608 |
15 | Planters Bank & Trust Company ** | Indianola, MS 38751 | $124,112 |
16 | Bryant Farms | Sledge, MS 38670 | $122,168 |
17 | Kal-mac Farms | Olive Branch, MS 38654 | $117,584 |
18 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $108,548 |
19 | Totelow Planting Co | Tunica, MS 38676 | $99,513 |
20 | Little Thailand Farms II | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $94,996 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>