Total Conservation Programs in Union County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 263
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Union County, Mississippi totaled $418,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hell Creek Farms LLC | New Albany, MS 38652 | $29,295 |
| 2 | Billy Wayne Willard | Etta, MS 38627 | $20,297 |
| 3 | Dan C Benefield | New Albany, MS 38652 | $15,616 |
| 4 | Lorie G Garner | New Albany, MS 38652 | $13,231 |
| 5 | Ellis Properties L P | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $10,225 |
| 6 | Gary W Rolison Sr | Ripley, MS 38663 | $8,840 |
| 7 | Neal Huskison | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $8,363 |
| 8 | Jim B Shirley | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $8,277 |
| 9 | Laura Dunnam | New Albany, MS 38652 | $7,903 |
| 10 | Stephens Farms LLC | Memphis, TN 38111 | $7,439 |
| 11 | Walter R Porter Estate Trust | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $7,280 |
| 12 | Randy Wall | New Albany, MS 38652 | $6,623 |
| 13 | Bank Of New Albany ** | New Albany, MS 38652 | $5,526 |
| 14 | Will R Ford | New Albany, MS 38652 | $5,213 |
| 15 | Jack Stacy | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $5,196 |
| 16 | Jarrett Irrevocable Trust | New Albany, MS 38652 | $5,160 |
| 17 | Richard H Russell Md Et Al Ptr | New Albany, MS 38652 | $3,938 |
| 18 | Billy Matkins | New Albany, MS 38652 | $3,570 |
| 19 | James P Lenske | Booneville, MS 38829 | $3,407 |
| 20 | Loy G Greer | Thaxton, MS 38871 | $3,392 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf