Market Loss Assistance Program in Yazoo County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 569
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Yazoo County, Mississippi totaled $23,617,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Colby Company V | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $905,095 |
2 | Phillips Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $629,970 |
3 | Phillips Planting Company LLC | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $553,706 |
4 | Jordan Planting Company | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $506,982 |
5 | Valley Planting Company | Satartia, MS 39162 | $468,952 |
6 | Cato Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $460,680 |
7 | Grosvenor Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $413,932 |
8 | Harris Land & Cattle Co | Benton, MS 39039 | $360,292 |
9 | Swayze Farms | Benton, MS 39039 | $339,367 |
10 | Coghlan & Sons | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $331,547 |
11 | Swan Farms | Mark Tree, AR 72365 | $331,194 |
12 | Locust Grove Planting Co | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $318,800 |
13 | T & S Farms | Satartia, MS 39162 | $309,577 |
14 | Bonnie Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $292,219 |
15 | Lakeland Planting Company | Tchula, MS 39169 | $284,961 |
16 | Erickson Planting Company | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $284,204 |
17 | Cotton Creek Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $276,292 |
18 | Horseshoe Joint Venture | Tchula, MS 39169 | $263,215 |
19 | Moore Farms | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $251,148 |
20 | Colby Company Iv | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $245,605 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>