Production Flexibility Program in Yazoo County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 743
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Yazoo County, Mississippi totaled $46,729,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Phillips Planting Company LLC | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,374,788 |
2 | Colby Company III | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,151,580 |
3 | Jordan Planting Company | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,035,990 |
4 | Valley Planting Company | Satartia, MS 39162 | $924,883 |
5 | Phillips Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $908,798 |
6 | Cato Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $907,000 |
7 | Colby Company V | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $692,778 |
8 | Swayze Farms | Benton, MS 39039 | $669,169 |
9 | Locust Grove Planting Co | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $647,800 |
10 | Swan Farms | Mark Tree, AR 72365 | $638,190 |
11 | Erickson Planting Company | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $567,668 |
12 | Grosvenor Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $554,111 |
13 | Cotton Creek Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $532,056 |
14 | Lakeland Planting Company | Tchula, MS 39169 | $527,567 |
15 | Coker Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $520,766 |
16 | Moore Farms | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $493,400 |
17 | Day Place Farms | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $489,392 |
18 | Bonnie Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $474,315 |
19 | Diamond P Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $464,814 |
20 | Goodwin Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $456,342 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>