Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Bollinger County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 377
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Bollinger County, Missouri totaled $463,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rickey Grantham | Jackson, MO 63755 | $36,491 |
| 2 | Linus & Cynthia Bridges Revocable Trust | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $11,471 |
| 3 | Kenneth W Shrum Revocable Trust Of 11/27/2002 | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $7,477 |
| 4 | Truman J Lemons | Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 | $7,434 |
| 5 | W W Farms | Glenallen, MO 63751 | $7,399 |
| 6 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $6,388 |
| 7 | Carl R Yamnitz | Sedgewickville, MO 63781 | $6,206 |
| 8 | Harry L Johnson Revocable Trust | Sedgewickville, MO 63781 | $5,402 |
| 9 | Hovis Farms | Greenville, MO 63944 | $5,336 |
| 10 | Ksk Farms Inc | Friedheim, MO 63747 | $5,277 |
| 11 | Richard Kranawetter | Patton, MO 63662 | $5,031 |
| 12 | Joshua Joseph David Crain | Patton, MO 63662 | $4,905 |
| 13 | Seiler Cattle LLC | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $4,603 |
| 14 | Douglas Arnzen Revocable Living Trust | Leopold, MO 63760 | $4,559 |
| 15 | Jerry V Marquis | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $4,242 |
| 16 | Fulton Farms Inc | Patton, MO 63662 | $3,889 |
| 17 | Mary Hahn | Sedgewickville, MO 63781 | $3,765 |
| 18 | Dale Davault Farms Limited Partne | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $3,724 |
| 19 | Lance D Vangennip | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $3,444 |
| 20 | Matthew Keith Brotherton | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $3,345 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf