Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Butler County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 640
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $3,492,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Southern Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $80,120 |
| 2 | Janes Family Partnership | Qulin, MO 63961 | $72,391 |
| 3 | Wright Brothers Partnership | Qulin, MO 63961 | $60,332 |
| 4 | Dabbs Farms | Fisk, MO 63940 | $54,128 |
| 5 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $51,740 |
| 6 | Clarence Edward Crites | Broseley, MO 63932 | $51,296 |
| 7 | Buttrey Farms | Fisk, MO 63940 | $49,622 |
| 8 | First Missouri State Bank ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63902 | $46,372 |
| 9 | Leonard Deken | Campbell, MO 63933 | $39,664 |
| 10 | Melvin Lee Lewis Jr | Fisk, MO 63940 | $38,700 |
| 11 | Denise Lewis | Fisk, MO 63940 | $38,699 |
| 12 | Page Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $34,197 |
| 13 | Nobles & Redmon Farming Partnership | Qulin, MO 63961 | $33,997 |
| 14 | Dale Morgan | Fisk, MO 63940 | $32,837 |
| 15 | Dockery Enterprise | Broseley, MO 63932 | $30,278 |
| 16 | Stacy Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $29,073 |
| 17 | Nicholas Dale Morgan | Broseley, MO 63932 | $28,481 |
| 18 | Justin Savat Partnership | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $27,956 |
| 19 | Matthew Musgraves LLC | Qulin, MO 63961 | $27,807 |
| 20 | Christopher Ward Berry | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $26,368 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf