Production Flexibility Program in Franklin County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 798
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Franklin County, Missouri totaled $5,770,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | R E Hinson | Saint Clair, MO 63077 | $11,716 |
122 | Gerlemann Bros | New Haven, MO 63068 | $11,590 |
123 | Francis C Aholt Revocable Living | Washington, MO 63090 | $11,515 |
124 | Howard W Mckeever | Catawissa, MO 63015 | $11,439 |
125 | Roman J Schroeder | Washington, MO 63090 | $11,363 |
126 | Haberberger Farm | Villa Ridge, MO 63089 | $11,134 |
127 | River Bluff Farm Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $10,865 |
128 | Warren E & Wilma J Dierker Trust | Grubville, MO 63041 | $10,830 |
129 | Noel Vieten | Leslie, MO 63056 | $10,633 |
130 | Florence Krueger Trust | Union, MO 63084 | $10,627 |
131 | Kevin Overschmidt | Robertsville, MO 63072 | $10,466 |
132 | Weber Dairy Farm, Inc. | Dittmer, MO 63023 | $10,276 |
133 | Eugene Brueggemann | Union, MO 63084 | $10,259 |
134 | Troy Blaue | Gerald, MO 63037 | $10,230 |
135 | James Richard Siess | Labadie, MO 63055 | $10,152 |
136 | Dean Steiger | New Haven, MO 63068 | $10,074 |
137 | Robert J Blaha Jr | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $9,953 |
138 | Timothy L Redhage | Union, MO 63084 | $9,797 |
139 | Meyer Farms | Washington, MO 63090 | $9,288 |
140 | Haberberger Farm, LLC | Villa Ridge, MO 63089 | $9,246 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”