Production Flexibility Program in Franklin County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 798
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Franklin County, Missouri totaled $5,770,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Deppe Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $248,202 |
2 | Scheer Agri-enterprises, Inc. | New Haven, MO 63068 | $219,016 |
3 | Kopmann Farms Inc | New Haven, MO 63068 | $154,287 |
4 | Riegel Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $145,737 |
5 | Overschmidt Farms Inc | Union, MO 63084 | $106,548 |
6 | Maczuk Farms Inc | New Haven, MO 63068 | $105,676 |
7 | Three Oaks Farms Inc | Augusta, MO 63332 | $105,390 |
8 | Hoemann Farms, Inc. % | Berger, MO 63014 | $100,339 |
9 | Edward George Heisel | Labadie, MO 63055 | $85,849 |
10 | Kloppe Dairy Farms Inc | New Haven, MO 63068 | $83,548 |
11 | Brinker Farms Inc | Auxvasse, MO 65231 | $78,920 |
12 | Flying M Ranch % M Maczuk | New Haven, MO 63068 | $76,271 |
13 | Leonard P Piontek & Geraldine W P | Washington, MO 63090 | $71,577 |
14 | Carl Farms | Berger, MO 63014 | $67,274 |
15 | Melvin Roewe Inc | New Haven, MO 63068 | $65,337 |
16 | Alt Farm LLC | Pacific, MO 63069 | $63,478 |
17 | Leo And Bernard Meyer Partnership | New Haven, MO 63068 | $60,500 |
18 | Alvin Thomas Shofner | Lonedell, MO 63060 | $56,959 |
19 | Ralph M Schebaum | Sullivan, MO 63080 | $53,231 |
20 | John A Busch | Washington, MO 63090 | $51,695 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>