Loan Deficiency in Franklin County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 661
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Franklin County, Missouri totaled $6,093,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deppe Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $565,697 |
| 2 | Scheer Agri-enterprises, Inc. | New Haven, MO 63068 | $268,918 |
| 3 | Riegel Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $264,654 |
| 4 | Three Oaks Farms Inc | Augusta, MO 63332 | $220,112 |
| 5 | Kopmann Farms Inc | New Haven, MO 63068 | $164,556 |
| 6 | Edward George Heisel | Labadie, MO 63055 | $144,175 |
| 7 | Hoemann Farms, Inc. % | Berger, MO 63014 | $98,838 |
| 8 | Maczuk Farms Inc | New Haven, MO 63068 | $96,775 |
| 9 | Kloppe Dairy Farms Inc | New Haven, MO 63068 | $93,902 |
| 10 | Overschmidt Farms Inc | Union, MO 63084 | $91,960 |
| 11 | Carl Farms | Berger, MO 63014 | $88,895 |
| 12 | Leonard P Piontek & Geraldine W P | Washington, MO 63090 | $78,536 |
| 13 | J & D Hellmann Farms | Villa Ridge, MO 63089 | $77,507 |
| 14 | Alt Farm LLC | Pacific, MO 63069 | $70,209 |
| 15 | Daniel Lee Kuenzel | Washington, MO 63090 | $69,945 |
| 16 | R Ley Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $67,286 |
| 17 | David James Calkins | Beaufort, MO 63013 | $64,884 |
| 18 | Flying M Ranch % M Maczuk | New Haven, MO 63068 | $62,413 |
| 19 | Fred Brinker Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $62,165 |
| 20 | Randolph Joseph Klenke | Union, MO 63084 | $60,966 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf