Total Conservation Programs in Harrison County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 768
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Harrison County, Missouri totaled $8,496,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dale Farming Company | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $131,722 |
2 | Ruth Ann Musick | Bethany, MO 64424 | $97,416 |
3 | Kleeman Family Partnership | Liberty, MO 64068 | $88,232 |
4 | First Missouri Bank ** | Brookfield, MO 64628 | $65,239 |
5 | Farmers Bank Of Northern ** | Centerville, IA 52544 | $57,214 |
6 | Mrs Annie L Mathews-mathews Trust | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $51,373 |
7 | Cuthbert M Strong Family Trust | Gulf Breeze, FL 32562 | $50,000 |
8 | David K Coleman | Savannah, MO 64485 | $49,286 |
9 | Sharon J Fenimore Revocable Trust | Bethany, MO 64424 | $49,122 |
10 | Jack D Fenimore Irrevocable Trust | Bethany, MO 64424 | $47,938 |
11 | Christopher Musick | Bethany, MO 64424 | $46,899 |
12 | Rmc Farms LLC | Kingwood, TX 77339 | $46,571 |
13 | Thomas And Charlene Hermansen Trust | Cassville, MO 65625 | $46,304 |
14 | M F & C Inc | Bethany, MO 64424 | $44,023 |
15 | Nature Calls LLC | Mc Fall, MO 64657 | $43,990 |
16 | Ronnie L Runyan Trust | Bethany, MO 64424 | $43,854 |
17 | Sandra J Runyan Trust | Bethany, MO 64424 | $43,854 |
18 | Harold Mcchesney | Hatfield, MO 64458 | $43,210 |
19 | Carl Folgate | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $42,470 |
20 | Mary R Cox | Bethany, MO 64424 | $42,362 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>