Conservation Reserve Program in Hickory County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 42
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Hickory County, Missouri totaled $655,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Claudia Driskill | Cross Timbers, MO 65634 | $133,407 |
2 | Charles H Finn Jr | Mokena, IL 60448 | $89,197 |
3 | Melvin Driskill | Cross Timbers, MO 65634 | $57,229 |
4 | Jim King | Columbia, MO 65201 | $40,214 |
5 | Kent King | Rolla, MO 65401 | $34,426 |
6 | Martin Prairie Farms | Humansville, MO 65674 | $34,230 |
7 | James R Crawford Revocable Trust | Pittsburg, MO 65724 | $28,771 |
8 | Crawford 96 Trust | Flemington, MO 65650 | $24,090 |
9 | Allen Shockley | Cross Timbers, MO 65634 | $21,423 |
10 | Donald Bays | Lees Summit, MO 64082 | $20,734 |
11 | Jo Frances Baker | Pleasant Hill, MO 64080 | $18,208 |
12 | George J Zerr | Clarksville, TN 37042 | $18,114 |
13 | Katherine Crawford | Denair, CA 95316 | $16,774 |
14 | Irene Zerr | Weaubleau, MO 65774 | $16,741 |
15 | Phillip Hazlett | Lees Summit, MO 64081 | $11,571 |
16 | Sandra King | Rolla, MO 65401 | $7,420 |
17 | Wanda Ahlborn | Wheatland, MO 65779 | $7,365 |
18 | Ronald L Jenkins | Wheatland, MO 65779 | $6,990 |
19 | Timothy S Steuber | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $5,500 |
20 | Naomi E Briggs | Gravois Mills, MO 65037 | $5,193 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>