Farm Subsidy information
Howard County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Howard County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 670
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Howard County, Missouri totaled $6,181,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Brad Kircher | New Franklin, MO 65274 | $35,748 |
22 | David C Mechlin | Columbia, MO 65203 | $35,684 |
23 | Robert G Kirby | Fayette, MO 65248 | $35,667 |
24 | S Bar S Farms Inc | Franklin, MO 65250 | $34,215 |
25 | Brian Haskamp | New Franklin, MO 65274 | $32,832 |
26 | Lori Jo Kitchen | Columbia, MO 65201 | $32,533 |
27 | Warren G Gerlt Jr | Fayette, MO 65248 | $32,241 |
28 | James Eric Colvin | Franklin, MO 65250 | $32,037 |
29 | Brand Brothers | Fayette, MO 65248 | $31,797 |
30 | Bruce Wayne Hackman | Fayette, MO 65248 | $31,438 |
31 | Stenn Inc | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $31,045 |
32 | Joseph K Sunderland | Fayette, MO 65248 | $30,119 |
33 | R&d Carmack Farms LLC | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $29,843 |
34 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $29,492 |
35 | Chad Randall Fuemmeler | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $29,235 |
36 | Richard Joseph Fuemmeler | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $29,086 |
37 | Kerry Gose | Columbia, MO 65203 | $27,134 |
38 | Foxtail Farms Faithful Family Farming, Inc. | Higbee, MO 65257 | $26,139 |
39 | John Allphin Farms LLC | Fayette, MO 65248 | $25,274 |
40 | Bernie Korte | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $25,021 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”