Farm Subsidy information
Howard County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Howard County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,321
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Howard County, Missouri totaled $152,217,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Longvue Farms Inc | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $410,659 |
62 | Stenn Inc | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $403,571 |
63 | Seth Belstle | Fayette, MO 65248 | $388,875 |
64 | Marion W Brand And Gwen M Brand Revocable Living T | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $385,564 |
65 | Brad Kircher | New Franklin, MO 65274 | $384,515 |
66 | Joseph K Sunderland | Fayette, MO 65248 | $380,037 |
67 | C K M Farms Inc | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $378,250 |
68 | R&d Carmack Farms LLC | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $375,140 |
69 | Jim Ferguson | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $371,893 |
70 | Samuel S Brand And Stephanie Brand Revocable Livin | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $369,063 |
71 | Kenneth K Caspall Revoc Trust | Columbia, MO 65201 | $367,401 |
72 | Leroy & Regina's Farms Inc | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $366,101 |
73 | Ron R Mcbee | Fayette, MO 65248 | $358,874 |
74 | Fred Bockting Jr | Fayette, MO 65248 | $353,021 |
75 | Wies Farms, Inc | Fayette, MO 65248 | $351,568 |
76 | Don & Terry Sanders | Fayette, MO 65248 | $351,406 |
77 | Linhart LLC | Fayette, MO 65248 | $349,104 |
78 | Steven Dean Ferguson | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $345,762 |
79 | Michael Vroman | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $340,110 |
80 | Wayne Fuemmeler | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $336,571 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”