Total Disaster Programs in Howard County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 192
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Howard County, Missouri totaled $2,372,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jackson-audsley Farms Inc | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $228,358 |
2 | Bruce Wayne Hackman | Fayette, MO 65248 | $108,482 |
3 | Reich Farms Inc | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $99,765 |
4 | Oran Carl Boulden | Fayette, MO 65248 | $65,501 |
5 | D & L Farming LLC | Fayette, MO 65248 | $64,878 |
6 | Roger Wittmeyer | Franklin, MO 65250 | $63,200 |
7 | Paul R Gross Irr Tr | Austin, TX 78737 | $51,071 |
8 | Hodel Farms L L C | Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 | $48,833 |
9 | Larry D Felten | Fayette, MO 65248 | $40,315 |
10 | Ronnie Strodtman LLC | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $40,279 |
11 | Longvue Farms Inc | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $40,066 |
12 | Chad Randall Fuemmeler | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $37,462 |
13 | L & S Felten Farms LLC | Fayette, MO 65248 | $34,074 |
14 | James Renfrow | New Franklin, MO 65274 | $31,346 |
15 | Anthony Joseph Westhues | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $31,159 |
16 | Marion W Brand And Gwen M Brand Revocable Living T | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $30,767 |
17 | Wilmsmeyer Farms, LLC | Franklin, MO 65250 | $29,622 |
18 | Samuel S Brand And Stephanie Brand Revocable Livin | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $29,321 |
19 | Robert Frederick Alexander II | Fayette, MO 65248 | $29,048 |
20 | Geoffrey Sanders LLC | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $28,777 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>