Farm Subsidy information
Knox County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Knox County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,529
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Knox County, Missouri totaled $277,417,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Thomas J Deveny | Edina, MO 63537 | $2,284,798 |
2 | 7-r Farms Inc | New Haven, MO 63068 | $2,264,616 |
3 | Kevin Strange | Edina, MO 63537 | $2,113,246 |
4 | Matt Jeffery Penn | Edina, MO 63537 | $1,692,892 |
5 | Lisa Jo Penn | Edina, MO 63537 | $1,679,641 |
6 | Daniel E Devlin | Edina, MO 63537 | $1,618,591 |
7 | Jeremy Schrage | Edina, MO 63537 | $1,580,573 |
8 | Kirk Alan Bryant | Edina, MO 63537 | $1,546,648 |
9 | Jo Anne Layman | Knox City, MO 63446 | $1,546,152 |
10 | Fred Carder Layman | Knox City, MO 63446 | $1,538,369 |
11 | Randy Eugene Doss | Novelty, MO 63460 | $1,535,639 |
12 | Scott Eric Jansen | Rutledge, MO 63563 | $1,412,815 |
13 | Douglas Farm Inc | Novelty, MO 63460 | $1,383,978 |
14 | Jerry F Shultz | Rutledge, MO 63563 | $1,369,574 |
15 | Steven Watson Miller | Knox City, MO 63446 | $1,330,473 |
16 | Kbrs Revocable Trust | Rutledge, MO 63563 | $1,254,798 |
17 | Mark Greenley | Knox City, MO 63446 | $1,242,868 |
18 | Kenneth Zimmerman Burkholder | Baring, MO 63531 | $1,223,320 |
19 | Anna Heather Schrage | Edina, MO 63537 | $1,160,442 |
20 | Darrell Dean Shultz | Rutledge, MO 63563 | $1,148,244 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>