Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Lawrence County, Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 172
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Lawrence County, Missouri totaled $1,879,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kingsley Brothers LLC | Miller, MO 65707 | $176,080 |
| 2 | Renkoski Land And Cattle LLC | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $171,027 |
| 3 | Art Mattlage | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $75,972 |
| 4 | Galen Thomas | Springfield, MO 65802 | $56,878 |
| 5 | Eula Mae Thomas | Golden City, MO 64748 | $48,857 |
| 6 | Jackie L Thomas | Golden City, MO 64748 | $48,857 |
| 7 | Spree Farms LLC | Mount Vernon, MO 65712 | $39,518 |
| 8 | Roger Duane Moennig | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $36,982 |
| 9 | Dennis Flehmer | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $34,842 |
| 10 | Dale L Richardson | Ash Grove, MO 65604 | $34,316 |
| 11 | Nathan Vernon Dostal | Mount Vernon, MO 65712 | $33,432 |
| 12 | Dennis Edward Worm | Monett, MO 65708 | $33,366 |
| 13 | Glen Moennig | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $33,066 |
| 14 | Matthew Duane Woodward | Mount Vernon, MO 65712 | $32,194 |
| 15 | Clyde Jones | Marionville, MO 65705 | $32,060 |
| 16 | Jerry Wayne Mcknight | Monett, MO 65708 | $31,810 |
| 17 | Roger Lee Bowles | Miller, MO 65707 | $31,662 |
| 18 | Matthew Jay Kingsley | Miller, MO 65707 | $30,034 |
| 19 | Gary D Wolf, Sole Prop. | Verona, MO 65769 | $29,820 |
| 20 | Jeremy Jelinek | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $27,092 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf