Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Mississippi County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 549
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Mississippi County, Missouri totaled $4,652,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $489,501 |
2 | Hbr Ag | Charleston, MO 63834 | $121,634 |
3 | M & M Ag Investments | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $117,433 |
4 | Big Oak Farms Inc | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $107,148 |
5 | Glenn Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $100,633 |
6 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $95,573 |
7 | R J S Burke Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $90,506 |
8 | J S P Farms | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $86,559 |
9 | Burke Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $85,007 |
10 | Moreton Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $81,157 |
11 | Burke Ag | Charleston, MO 63834 | $67,235 |
12 | Feezor Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $62,575 |
13 | Marshall Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $62,500 |
14 | Stallings Brothers | Charleston, MO 63834 | $56,349 |
15 | George C Shelby | Charleston, MO 63834 | $51,588 |
16 | Marshall Affiliates Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $47,612 |
17 | Barnett Farms Inc | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $47,027 |
18 | Leslie S Fox Living Trust | Charleston, MO 63834 | $46,821 |
19 | Daniel J Babb Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $46,732 |
20 | Eleanor Susan Hequembourg | Charleston, MO 63834 | $43,311 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>