Conservation Reserve Program in Monroe County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 443
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Monroe County, Missouri totaled $2,294,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Normo Farms LLC | Washington, MO 63090 | $10,625 |
62 | Joe Bodine | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $10,469 |
63 | Saunders Farms LLC | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $10,180 |
64 | Aubuchon Madison LLC | Old Monroe, MO 63369 | $10,118 |
65 | David Harmon | Manchester, MO 63021 | $10,033 |
66 | James Richard Legrand | Madison, MO 65263 | $9,992 |
67 | Anne Carman Trust | Saint Louis, MO 63130 | $9,875 |
68 | Roy R Nordwald | Mexico, MO 65265 | $9,847 |
69 | Gregory S Maubach | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $9,826 |
70 | George Raymond Bono | Rolla, MO 65401 | $9,767 |
71 | Althaven LLC | Columbia, MO 65201 | $9,604 |
72 | Ark Properties LLC | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $9,584 |
73 | Russell T Johnson Farms Inc | Mexico, MO 65265 | $9,307 |
74 | Ronnie Baker Revocable Trust | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $8,965 |
75 | Craig White | Mexico, MO 65265 | $8,936 |
76 | Rottger Brothers Construction & Concrete Inc | Old Monroe, MO 63369 | $8,889 |
77 | Gipson Joint Revocable Living Trust U/a April 30 2 | Paris, MO 65275 | $8,739 |
78 | T & J Sachs Farms Lp | Flinthill, MO 63346 | $8,685 |
79 | Jonathan R Morris | Troy, MO 63379 | $8,654 |
80 | Cathy J Pieper | Moscow Mills, MO 63362 | $8,581 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”