SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 22
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $181,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Christopher Dale Driskill | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $34,044 |
| 2 | Vernon Ray Fowler | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $29,775 |
| 3 | Bruce Huffstutler | Matthews, MO 63867 | $18,854 |
| 4 | Nichols Family Farm | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $16,481 |
| 5 | Bradley W Jones | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $14,882 |
| 6 | Hale Farms | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $14,207 |
| 7 | Henry David Hunter Sr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $13,093 |
| 8 | Brian Ivan Jones | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $12,282 |
| 9 | Sherman Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $9,283 |
| 10 | Alma Pace | Matthews, MO 63867 | $4,526 |
| 11 | Virginia Bird | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $3,159 |
| 12 | Timothy A Fowler | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $2,210 |
| 13 | Hullen Driskill Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,558 |
| 14 | Stokes - Jericho Farms | Malden, MO 63863 | $1,556 |
| 15 | Johnnie Mcvay | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $1,195 |
| 16 | Frederic Nichols | Poolesville, MD 20837 | $1,159 |
| 17 | Geneva Day | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,002 |
| 18 | David Kenedy | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $984 |
| 19 | John D Palmer | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $701 |
| 20 | Jayne Family Farm | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $312 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf