Environmental Quality Incentives Program in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 80
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $266,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tommy Lawfield Jr Farms | Catron, MO 63833 | $15,756 |
2 | Hoggard Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $13,923 |
3 | Larry Woolverton Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $13,699 |
4 | Rick Towery Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $11,230 |
5 | Hunter Enterprises, Inc | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $10,050 |
6 | John Wescoat Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $9,397 |
7 | Bob - Grissom Family Grissom | Gideon, MO 63848 | $9,267 |
8 | A J P Corp | Gideon, MO 63848 | $9,045 |
9 | Bob Grissom Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $8,298 |
10 | Anderson Farms Inc | Gideon, MO 63848 | $7,875 |
11 | Duncan Farms Inc | Gideon, MO 63848 | $7,443 |
12 | Lfj Family Farm | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $7,360 |
13 | Hugh Landers | Gideon, MO 63848 | $7,230 |
14 | J & M Priggel Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $6,570 |
15 | Joe Woolverton Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $6,545 |
16 | Rick Branch Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $6,490 |
17 | Delouri Farms Inc | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $5,850 |
18 | Hawes Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $4,844 |
19 | John - John & Ellie Klipfel | Portageville, MO 63873 | $4,500 |
20 | Charles W Hawkins | Matthews, MO 63867 | $4,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>