Farm Subsidy information
Pettis County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Pettis County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 786
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pettis County, Missouri totaled $16,661,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Roger Dieckman | Mora, MO 65345 | $38,710 |
42 | Amac Farms, LLC | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $38,257 |
43 | Robert E Thompson Rev Trust | La Monte, MO 65337 | $37,442 |
44 | Broken G Farms LLC | Windsor, MO 65360 | $37,309 |
45 | Steven G Deuschle | Pilot Grove, MO 65276 | $36,549 |
46 | Green Hill Farms LLC | Smithton, MO 65350 | $36,012 |
47 | Kenneth Dean Combs | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $35,388 |
48 | Angela M Ehlers | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $35,216 |
49 | Greg Young | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $34,704 |
50 | Roger K Cordes | Ionia, MO 65335 | $34,311 |
51 | Daren Leicher | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $34,101 |
52 | Travis Warner | La Monte, MO 65337 | $33,854 |
53 | Jon R Purchase | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $33,270 |
54 | Matthias Oakley Green III | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $33,248 |
55 | Jordan L Nygaard | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $32,397 |
56 | Anthony Frederick Schwartz | Smithton, MO 65350 | $31,889 |
57 | Robert Aaron Kroeger | Smithton, MO 65350 | $30,138 |
58 | Brian D Nolting | Versailles, MO 65084 | $29,872 |
59 | Brendan Bass | Florence, MO 65329 | $29,169 |
60 | Chris Scott Brown | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $28,729 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”