Total Commodity Programs in Pettis County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 878
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pettis County, Missouri totaled $5,186,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Richard Helmig | Otterville, MO 65348 | $102,347 |
2 | Bill Hamilton Jr | Windsor, MO 65360 | $92,228 |
3 | South Fork Farms Inc | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $90,045 |
4 | Moses Yoder Jr | La Monte, MO 65337 | $85,501 |
5 | Dustin Lane Meyer | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $79,656 |
6 | Double Bar R Cattle & Grain Company LLC | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $77,249 |
7 | Jones Bros Farms Inc | La Monte, MO 65337 | $73,747 |
8 | Thomas R Parsons Tyler | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $70,976 |
9 | O-rich Dairy | Mora, MO 65345 | $70,084 |
10 | Charles Edward Hardy | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $69,308 |
11 | Tracy Dale Monsees | Smithton, MO 65350 | $59,718 |
12 | Guier Family Farms/barry Guier | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $59,165 |
13 | J C Ranch Inc | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $54,674 |
14 | Green Hill Farms LLC | Smithton, MO 65350 | $54,139 |
15 | Meyer Farm Inc | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $52,634 |
16 | Samuel Dove | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $49,197 |
17 | David W Callis | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $48,564 |
18 | Randy Martin Farms Inc | La Monte, MO 65337 | $45,656 |
19 | Carl Eugene Arnett | La Monte, MO 65337 | $43,742 |
20 | Amac Farms, LLC | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $43,488 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>