Counter Cyclical Program in Pettis County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,060
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Pettis County, Missouri totaled $3,007,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | South Fork Farms Inc | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $54,231 |
| 2 | Charles Edward Hardy | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $47,069 |
| 3 | Barry Guier Revocable Living Trus | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $46,741 |
| 4 | J C Ranch Inc | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $42,468 |
| 5 | Robert L Blackburn Revocable Living Trust | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $42,242 |
| 6 | Williams Farm Inc | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $40,101 |
| 7 | Olipharm Inc C/o Wm R Lemons | La Monte, MO 65337 | $38,451 |
| 8 | Mike Knaus | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $35,142 |
| 9 | Samuel Dove | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $31,205 |
| 10 | Randy Martin Farms Inc | La Monte, MO 65337 | $29,874 |
| 11 | Laurence Ray Claycomb | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $26,117 |
| 12 | Double Bar R Cattle & Grain Company LLC | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $25,468 |
| 13 | Thomas R Parsons Tyler | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $25,245 |
| 14 | Richard Helmig | Otterville, MO 65348 | $24,273 |
| 15 | Green Hill Farms LLC | Smithton, MO 65350 | $23,136 |
| 16 | Burkhalter Family Trust | Windsor, MO 65360 | $22,331 |
| 17 | E-p Rieckhoff Farms LLC | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $21,904 |
| 18 | Meyer Farm Inc | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $21,765 |
| 19 | Sawford Farms Inc | Otterville, MO 65348 | $21,421 |
| 20 | Williams Family Farms Inc | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $21,349 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf