Loan Deficiency in Pettis County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,164
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Pettis County, Missouri totaled $16,282,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Charles Edward Hardy | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $334,756 |
2 | Barry Guier Revocable Living Trus | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $271,853 |
3 | J C Ranch Inc | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $260,217 |
4 | Mike Knaus | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $257,621 |
5 | Olipharm Inc C/o Wm R Lemons | La Monte, MO 65337 | $236,133 |
6 | Robert Kahrs Longan | Windsor, MO 65360 | $235,250 |
7 | Samuel Dove | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $202,172 |
8 | Richard Helmig | Otterville, MO 65348 | $186,921 |
9 | Robert L Blackburn Revocable Living Trust | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $181,906 |
10 | Williams Family Farms Inc | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $177,184 |
11 | Jones Bros Farms Inc | La Monte, MO 65337 | $159,884 |
12 | Randy Martin Farms Inc | La Monte, MO 65337 | $159,530 |
13 | Richard Rice Farms Inc | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $152,352 |
14 | Earl Summers | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $142,917 |
15 | Susan S Callis | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $140,362 |
16 | David Gerken | La Monte, MO 65337 | $138,532 |
17 | Larry D Wilson Farms Inc | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $136,010 |
18 | Laurence Ray Claycomb | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $128,559 |
19 | Charles M Lazenby Trust | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $127,108 |
20 | Green Hill Farms LLC | Smithton, MO 65350 | $119,719 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>