Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Pettis County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 56
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Pettis County, Missouri totaled $521,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Meyer Farm Inc | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $8,640 |
22 | William Pointer | Marshall, MO 65340 | $8,065 |
23 | Larry D Wilson Farms Inc | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $7,200 |
24 | Charles R Whorton Trust | Siloam Springs, AR 72761 | $7,032 |
25 | Mary Ella Boatright-pace | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $6,669 |
26 | Charles E Sears | Pilot Grove, MO 65276 | $6,480 |
27 | Williams Farm Inc | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $6,411 |
28 | Steven Dale Brockman | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $5,873 |
29 | Vern Bohling | Mora, MO 65345 | $4,416 |
30 | Kristy Bluhm Fisher | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $4,197 |
31 | Williams Family Farms Inc | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $3,500 |
32 | E Harold Vannoy | Rochester Hills, MI 48306 | $3,500 |
33 | Robert Kahrs Longan | Windsor, MO 65360 | $3,500 |
34 | Catherine Scott | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $3,446 |
35 | Stacey A Barnes | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $3,161 |
36 | Nellie Shireman | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $2,809 |
37 | Selken Farms | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $2,789 |
38 | Matt Boatright | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $2,449 |
39 | Eldon Eugene Rieckhoff | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $2,347 |
40 | The Jones Farm Inc | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $2,315 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”