Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Platte County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Platte County, Missouri totaled $34,232 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Janice J Tanner | Bardwell, KY 42023 | $3,500 |
2 | Ron Duncan | Dearborn, MO 64439 | $3,500 |
3 | Luther Foster | Dearborn, MO 64439 | $3,425 |
4 | Anna Laura Matney | Gower, MO 64454 | $3,263 |
5 | Wilson Farm Inc | Weston, MO 64098 | $3,056 |
6 | Gordon Ray Sherwood | Edgerton, MO 64444 | $3,001 |
7 | Georgia B Adkins Trust | Dearborn, MO 64439 | $2,416 |
8 | Joseph Matthews | Platte City, MO 64079 | $2,003 |
9 | Berniece Love | Edgerton, MO 64444 | $1,892 |
10 | Ronnie P Guinn Sr | Faucett, MO 64448 | $1,588 |
11 | Everett M Boydston | Camden Point, MO 64018 | $1,150 |
12 | Jim Livingston | Castle Rock, CO 80104 | $1,047 |
13 | George H Davis Trust 1935 | Kansas City, MO 64121 | $621 |
14 | Minerva Gundelfinger Trust-charit | Kansas City, MO 64121 | $621 |
15 | George H Davis Trust 1955/bank Of | Kansas City, MO 64121 | $621 |
16 | George H Davis Trust 1944/bank Of | Kansas City, MO 64121 | $621 |
17 | Elizabeth O Davis Trust | Kansas City, MO 64121 | $620 |
18 | Chas Perry | Edgerton, MO 64444 | $528 |
19 | David Goodlet | Dearborn, MO 64439 | $409 |
20 | James D Jamie Jones | Weston, MO 64098 | $350 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>