Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Ralls County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 56
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Ralls County, Missouri totaled $1,413,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Willoughby Adam Gatson | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $131,358 |
| 2 | Franklin Eugene Wallace | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $114,953 |
| 3 | J & J Epperson | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $105,233 |
| 4 | Lehenbauer Livestock & Grain Farms Inc | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $85,216 |
| 5 | George Christopher Kohl | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $83,106 |
| 6 | Timothy Wayne Kurz | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $58,024 |
| 7 | Wilson Tuley Elliott | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $57,917 |
| 8 | Micah Lehenbauer Farms Inc | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $56,190 |
| 9 | Mitchell Lehenbauer Farms | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $52,327 |
| 10 | Boling Farms | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $50,883 |
| 11 | Edward Joseph Hamill | Perry, MO 63462 | $48,592 |
| 12 | Todd Hays Farms Inc | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $40,405 |
| 13 | David Ketsenburg Farms Inc | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $40,385 |
| 14 | Averil Wayne Beshears Jr Revocable Trust | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $29,733 |
| 15 | Bradd Farms Inc | Cooksville, IL 61730 | $29,114 |
| 16 | Shane Mcclintic | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $28,459 |
| 17 | Keith Glennon Mudd | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $28,449 |
| 18 | Virginia Mcclintic | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $27,352 |
| 19 | James A Hooker Living Trust | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $25,428 |
| 20 | Mary Bell Gentry | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $24,907 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf