Total Conservation Programs in Saint Clair County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 350
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Saint Clair County, Missouri totaled $8,643,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | James K Howe | Rockville, MO 64780 | $705,275 |
2 | James Huffman J D Baker Trustee | Osceola, MO 64776 | $395,722 |
3 | Kysar Farms Limited Partnership | Rockville, MO 64780 | $375,098 |
4 | Mark E Siegismund | Rockville, MO 64780 | $363,784 |
5 | Roger Garfield Gurley | Lowry City, MO 64763 | $238,865 |
6 | Carl H Nitsche Revocable Trust Da | Osceola, MO 64776 | $196,739 |
7 | James A Wright | Lowry City, MO 64763 | $185,966 |
8 | Herman Nitsche | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $183,045 |
9 | Roger Gurley Inc | Lowry City, MO 64763 | $161,712 |
10 | Wilma L Parks | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $139,313 |
11 | Gene Parks | Rockville, MO 64780 | $139,279 |
12 | Brownsberger Angus Farm | Springfield, MO 65803 | $123,068 |
13 | Bolander Ranch Inc | Osceola, MO 64776 | $119,290 |
14 | Firmin E Snodell Living Trust Dat | Leawood, KS 66206 | $117,370 |
15 | Kathy Conrad | Deepwater, MO 64740 | $117,074 |
16 | Dan Oberly | Rockville, MO 64780 | $115,846 |
17 | Gladys Harper | Clinton, MO 64735 | $115,733 |
18 | Pamela Sue Walker Revocable Livin | Rockville, MO 64780 | $110,334 |
19 | Jeff Utz | Rockville, MO 64780 | $103,340 |
20 | David Barger | Rockville, MO 64780 | $97,693 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>