Total Conservation Programs in Saint Louis County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Saint Louis County, Missouri totaled $204,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mo Department Of Conservation | Saint Charles, MO 63304 | $62,763 |
| 2 | Mjcf Family Land Company | El Paso, TX 79902 | $42,720 |
| 3 | Five-j Family Limited Partnership | Kimberling Cy, MO 65686 | $32,803 |
| 4 | Heck Properties LLC | Weldon Spring, MO 63304 | $24,505 |
| 5 | Missouri Investment Management | Uxbridge, MA 01569 | $12,602 |
| 6 | Hilda Kuhn | Saint Louis, MO 63141 | $9,933 |
| 7 | Don Gerling | Florissant, MO 63034 | $8,294 |
| 8 | Raymond Weber | Saint Louis, MO 63138 | $4,572 |
| 9 | Gilbert V Mertz | Ballwin, MO 63011 | $3,532 |
| 10 | Gilbert V Mertz Trust | Saint Louis, MO 63131 | $1,232 |
| 11 | John D Quaethem | Chesterfield, MO 63005 | $606 |
| 12 | Jeanie Louise Stewart | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $112 |
| 13 | Robert Steven Stewart | Richland, WA 99354 | $112 |
| 14 | Denny W Mertz | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $62 |
| 15 | Janet L Graham Revocable Living T | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $62 |
| 16 | Glenn E Mertz | Fort Myers, FL 33905 | $62 |
| 17 | Cynthia D Mertz Living Trust | Des Peres, MO 63131 | $62 |
| 18 | Barry K Mertz Living Trust | Andrews, TX 79714 | $61 |
| 19 | Wendy Mertz Slifka Revocable Livi | Knoxville, TN 37922 | $61 |
| 20 | Larry Teson | Auxvasse, MO 65231 | $-24 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf